By Bal(t)imoron, 1 year ago

Don't Discount the Need for Korean Union

I have only one problem with Bruce Klinger's : Klinger fails to recognize the ways in which Korean unification will affect ROK-US relations. I don't think he recognizes how much some sort of inter-Korean economic community is more important for Seoul than it is for the US, or the North Korean issue itself.

For instance, Grand National Party presidential candidate, former Seoul Mayor Lee Myung-bak, has presented . This is more than just, in Klinger's argument, a «policies to fend off internal dissension and gain favor with the populace.» Some sort of economic union with North Korea responds to a majority of elite and popular South Korean opinion. Military engagement with North Korea is subordinate to the unquestioned need for economic union.

Klinger's recommendations would still not avert a ROK-US impasse. The only development remaining to occur is whether Seoul responds to the US by ending the ROK-US military alliance (although it would certainly want to retain a trading relationship).

Sphere: Related Content

Write a comment

If you want to add your comment on this post, simply fill out the next form:





Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.

No comments

Be the first to write a comment on this post.

No trackbacks

To notify a mention on this post in your blog, enable automated notification (Options > Discussion in WordPress) or specify this trackback url: http://​www.radicalcontrapositions.com/​left_flank/​2007/​09/​14/​dont-discount-the-need-for-korean-union/​trackback/