Three Perspectives on the Estrada Pardon
Manuel L. Quezon, III's sociological insight is a fitting rejoinder to both an apoplectic denunciation and a detached examination of why The Philippines' President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo pardoned her convicted political rival and predecessor, Joseph Estrada.
In a nation where symbolism trumps substance, Estrada never had to suffer for his rhetoric, the President never gave the legal process to reach its final conclusion; there wasn’t even a token effort at proving justice could be tempered with mercy; instead, mercenary calculations were passed off as executive mercy. But, as Amang Rodriguez so famously said, “in the long of time, we shall success.�
Can I even ask that the victory go to the Filipino people, and not Arroyo or Jose De Venecia, III?
Sphere: Related Content





Write a comment
If you want to add your comment on this post, simply fill out the next form:
You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.
No comments
Be the first to write a comment on this post.
No trackbacks
To notify a mention on this post in your blog, enable automated notification (Options > Discussion in WordPress) or specify this trackback url: http://www.radicalcontrapositions.com/left_flank/2007/10/27/three-perspectives-on-the-estrada-pardon/trackback/