Share this post
Barrapunto
CoRank Español
Delicious
Enchílame
Fresqui Ocio
Furl
Google Bookmarks
Menéame
Netscape
Newsvine
Stumbleupon
Technorati Favorites
Yahoo MyWeb
In order to send this post to a friend, enter his/her email and also your data:
2 comments
No trackbacks






Write a comment
If you want to add your comment on this post, simply fill out the next form:
You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.
2 comments
7 months and 8 days ago
Not that Pullman's theological attacks aren't well-put and thoughtfully executed, but the book is about two children. Whatever the two represent (i.e., Adam and Eve), it takes a certain kind of child to understand these books.
Sam Eliot in his Charlie Rose interview called the books, «family fare» and argued that the book was about «free will». I think both comments are equally valid. A Pandagon commenter also argued that for an atheist, Pullman leaves a lot of theological in his trilogy. The visible souls, or daemons, have attracted so much attention, and cost so much CGI funds to reproduce on film. It takes a great deal of reading to follow Pullman's allusions, even though he could have done more. And, really, the stuff about the Church is more background than overt.
7 months and 9 days ago
Interesting post. I've been marginally aware of the buzz that the movie wimped out on the religious aspects, so it was nice to read some more details. Pretty heart-tugging excerpt from Pullman interview, too.