By Bal(t)imoron, 8 months and 19 days ago

Could DPRK Be Any Worse?

Weekly Standard's Michael Goldfarb argues that "" in DPRK? I think this is the first bloggingheads TV diavlog that so well captures the humdrum Washington debate between Clintonians and Neo-cons on the DPRK issue right now. Just as in Iraq, no one can think beyond the fall of the government, or to consider the non-proliferation regime as a whole, and Neo-Cons assume that there's a nascent government waiting to stop an even more tragic catastrophe from ensuing.

Actually, Foreign Policy's Blake Hounshell, Goldfarb's interlocutor, is still just , and both fail to mention the HEU (highly-enriched uranium) issue. is a red herring, most probably more of the Israel-Bush administration echo chamber seeking to stir up a controversy to derail the Six-Party process.

In the end (and in ""), this is at best a much more civil, yet equally as arid and boilerplate a discussion, as the Korean blogosphere produces on a daily basis.

Sphere: Related Content

Write a comment

If you want to add your comment on this post, simply fill out the next form:





Currently you have JavaScript disabled. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page.

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.

2 comments

Gravatar #2. Bal(t)imoron
8 months and 18 days ago

Thanks for the link!

No trackbacks

To notify a mention on this post in your blog, enable automated notification (Options > Discussion in WordPress) or specify this trackback url: http://​www.radicalcontrapositions.com/​left_flank/​2008/​01/​24/​could-dprk-be-any-worse/​trackback/