By Bal(t)imoron, 1 month and 29 days ago
The Post-1989 Fumble
Tom Engelhardt asks probably the easiest question possible on American foreign policy:
Almost seven and a half years later, an observer might be pardoned for wondering whether there hadn't been two super losers in the Cold War. Had the Soviet Union, the weaker of the two great powers of the second half of the last century, simply imploded first, while the U.S., enwreathed in a cloud of self-congratulation, was almost unbeknownst to itself also slowly making its way toward an exit?
After both...
 |
The Pentagon's New Map: War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century by Thomas P.M. Barnett |
...and:
 |
Globalization and Its Discontents by Joseph E. Stiglitz |
...criticized American security and financial policy after the fall of the Berlin Wall, this is really a question no ideology owns. Relating America's political demise to oil shocks is mistaking a proximate for an ultimate cause.
Sphere: Related Content
Barrapunto
CoRank Español
Delicious
Enchílame
Fresqui Ocio
Furl
Google Bookmarks
Menéame
Netscape
Newsvine
Stumbleupon
Technorati Favorites
Yahoo MyWeb
Write a comment
No trackbacks
RSS 2.0
Bloglines
Live
MyAOL
Netvibes
Newsgator
Rojo
Write a comment
If you want to add your comment on this post, simply fill out the next form:
You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.
No comments
Be the first to write a comment on this post.
No trackbacks
To notify a mention on this post in your blog, enable automated notification (Options > Discussion in WordPress) or specify this trackback url: http://www.radicalcontrapositions.com/left_flank/2008/05/10/the-post-1989-fumble/trackback/