By Bal(t)imoron, 1 month and 28 days ago

Buddhism Offers No Political Shortcuts

The Atlantic's :

There may be something or nothing to learn about democracy from these spectacles. The first suggests that the movement for Tibetan independence does not answer only to the Dalai Lama, and that China may have a bigger , with a wider and more distributed base, than it thought. Would Lhasa consider exchanging the unquestioned rule of Hu Jintao for something more than the unquestioned rule of Tenzin Gyatso? As for the Bhutanese monarch, all signs point to democracy -- except for the often and freely expressed desire of the Bhutanese to keep and revere the monarchy, with or without elections. Whatever else this shows, it should put rest to the notion that democratization of the Buddhist street is any simpler -- or more welcome -- than democratization of the Arab one.

, though, goes to French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner:

On Wednesday, Kouchner told RMC radio and BFM television that the boycott was not a bad idea. But "it seems unrealistic," he said. "There are a lot of good ideas that can't be put into practice."

"When you're dealing in international relations with countries as important as China, obviously when you make economic decisions it's sometimes at the expense of human rights," he added. "That's elementary realism."

It's no time for sycophantic devotion to one political course, religion, leader, or even state, especially when .

Sphere: Related Content

By Bal(t)imoron, 1 month and 29 days ago

Democracy by Command

Bhutanese Vote on Command The Bhutanese electorate is , between two parties without a disagreement, and to . Just last year, some Bhutanese believed .

According to a quote in a CNN report, "It's not that the . They want monarchy more," Dorji said. "Monarchy has been a success story in this country. We've always had very good kings."

And, there's a darker side.

In 1990, tens of thousands of ethnic Nepalis were forced out of Bhutan after protesting against the imposition of national dress and the closure of Nepali language schools. More than 100,000 now live in crowded camps inside Nepal.

A similar number still live in southern Bhutan, but exiled groups say tens of thousands have been denied identity cards – and thus voting rights – making »a mockery» of the election.

»The strategy is to depopulate people of Nepali origin from the country,» Narad Adhikari of the Druk National Congress, an exile group, said in Kakarvitta, on the India-Nepal border. »If they don't have voting rights, their citizenship is in danger.»

Rebel groups, with recruits largely drawn from the refugee camps, have emerged in the past year and have threatened to disrupt the polls. They have detonated 11 bombs inside Bhutan this year, killing at least one person.

Now, that sounds like a controversy worthy of the people's decision.

Sphere: Related Content